lets us assume that Beauty is the recognition of truths that are within ourselves, and that there is an object truth.
As non-perfect beings some of what we recognise inside ourselves as truths are infact non-truths, this leads to representations of these non-truths as being percieved as beautiful. This could be described as False Beauty, for a perfect being would not find such an object to be beautiful.
and i’m afraid this leaves us in a similar conundrum to where we started, for beauty is a representation of truth, however things that are not true can apear to be beautiful.
this could be used as an argument against modern art which strives for the subjective rather than the objective, and in so doing decieves itself with false beauty.
could not the modernist then say that the only beauty we can ever see is our representation of it and thus the difference between true and false beauty is negated by our complete separation from it.
that beauty is instantaneous, that the false appearing beautiful is beautiful and true at that time. For what it is and what it strives for. For a subjective view but in that, the striving is a True abstract view of Beauty.
i think that so long as their is objective truth, their is objective beauty. The closer an individual is to truth the closer their appreciation of beauty is to objectivity.